After Your Bio-Enrollment & Login is completed you must access the third party payment gateway and pay the remote access fee %1
Welcome to your Hybrid and Virtual Courts As courtrooms around the country embrace a new hybrid reality, judicial leaders are tasked with understanding how to use technology to improve experiences and increase access to justice. This guide explores the future of courts — offering industry insights and tips on how to create a courtroom designed for tomorrow.
We provide accurate and timely court reporting services for all your legal needs. Our team of experienced reporters is dedicated to delivering high-quality transcripts with exceptional attention to detail. Contact us today to schedule your next deposition or hearing.
VideoCourt's Remote Appearance Platform combines the latest technologies with exceptional customer service, creating the ideal remote court appearance
Multiple state government agencies have partnered with ID.me to create a highly secure identity verification process that ensures you, and only you, will be able to access your unemployment benefits.
Biometric Technologies
The field of biometrics continues to expand and diversify. As customers around the world find new uses for biometrics, innovative technologies to meet those needs are now beginning to reach maturity. There is no single biometric technology which can meet the broad needs of every customer - each technology has certain advantages
Biometric Technologies and the field of biometrics continues to expand and diversify. As customers around the world find new uses for biometrics, innovative technologies to meet those needs are now beginning to reach maturity. There is no single biometric technology which can meet the broad needs of every customer - each technology has certain advantages which naturally lend themselves to different use cases.
Naturally lend themselves to different use cases.
A LegalShield Personal Plan allows you and your family access to legal consultation and support on an unlimited number of legal matters – for a fraction of traditional law firm hourly rates.
Law&Crime, the legal and true crime network, is now available on YouTube TV in the US as an optional add-on service.
Law&Crime features multiple live trials daily along with expert legal analysis and commentary. The network is in the midst of daily live coverage of the murder trial of real estate heir Robert Durst and last week was live on
Law&Crime, the legal and true crime network, is now available on YouTube TV in the US as an optional add-on service.
Law&Crime features multiple live trials daily along with expert legal analysis and commentary. The network is in the midst of daily live coverage of the murder trial of real estate heir Robert Durst and last week was live onsite with full coverage of the Derek Chauvin sentencing. The network also hosts a roster of original programming.
As courtrooms around the country embrace a new hybrid reality, judicial leaders are tasked with understanding how to use technology to improve experiences and increase access to justice. This guide explores the future of courts — offering industry insights and tips on how to build a hybrid or virtual courtroom designed for tomorrow.
Is A industry leader in providing supported Remote Legal Collaboration services throughout the United States, Canada and Worldwide.
Designed by attorneys, our Remote Appearance Platform combines the latest technologies with exceptional customer service, creating the ideal remote Court Appearance for Judges, Court Staff, attorneys and oth
Is A industry leader in providing supported Remote Legal Collaboration services throughout the United States, Canada and Worldwide.
Designed by attorneys, our Remote Appearance Platform combines the latest technologies with exceptional customer service, creating the ideal remote Court Appearance for Judges, Court Staff, attorneys and other participants and provides time and cost efficiencies for the legal community. CourtCall's secure and supported platform can meet all Remote Collaboration needs of any court, law firm, attorney, administrative agency, corrections facility or other justice partner.
The Judicial Conference Cameras In Court Policy lists the circumstances under which judges may authorize the use of cameras in courtrooms.
The Ninth Circuit Judicial Council, in cooperation with the Judicial Conference, has authorized the three districts in the Ninth Circuit (District Court for the Northern District of California, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court for the Western District of Washington) that participated in the 2011-2015 cameras pilot to continue the pilot program under the Same Terms And Conditions to provide longer term data and information to the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management.
Americans with Disabilities Act
Criminal Law
Related Civil Cases
Diversity
Employment Discrimination
Environmental/Land
UseERISA
First Amendment
Fraud
Freedom of Religion
Habeas Corpus
/PrisonerHousing
Interstate Transportation
Jurisdiction
Labor and Employment
Libel and Slander
Multidistrict Litigation
National Security
Other
Last Update
View video recordings of the cases from the District Court for the Northern District of California, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court for the Western District of Washington.
United States of America v. City of SeattleWestern District of Washington Civil Rights, Criminal Law Related Civil Cases, Diversity, Search and Seizure Status Conference February 4, 2021
In re Capacitors Antitrust LitigationNorthern District of California Multi-district Litigation Jury Trial March 5, 2020
In re PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Northern District of California Bankruptcy Status Conference December 17, 2019
Food & Water Watch, Inc., et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.Northern District of California Environmental/Land Use Motion for Summary Judgment November 15, 2019
Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, et al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNorthern District of California Environmental/Land Use Motion to Dismiss September 5, 2019
Dalessio v. University of WashingtonWestern District of Washington Public Records Act Motion for Summary Judgment June 10, 2019
Jewel v. NSANorthern District of California Civil Rights, Search and Seizure Motion for Summary Judgment March 29, 2019
Padilla et al v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement et alWestern District of Washington Civil Rights Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief March 26, 2019
Dickert v. Sanyo Energy (U.S.A.)Northern District of California Motion to Enforce Judgement March 7, 2019
U.S.A. vs. Government of GuamDistrict of Guam Environmental/Land Use Status Conference March 7, 2019
San Francisco v Trump, California v SessionsNorthern District of California Motion for Summary Judgment February 13, 2019
In re Roundup Products Liability LitigationNorthern District of California Personal Injury/Wrongful Death Daubert Hearing February 11, 2019
Echavaria v. Facebook, Inc.Northern District of California Personal Injury/Wrongful Death Tutorial January 9, 2019
State of California v. SessionsNorthern District of California Motion to Enforce Judgement December 21, 2018
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant et al. v. Donald J. Trump et alNorthern District of California Other Immigration Actions Motion for Temporary Restraining Order November 19, 2018
Ramos et al v. Nielsen et alNorthern District of California Civil Rights Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, Motion to Dismiss September 25, 2018
State of California v. Ross et alNorthern District of California Administrative Procedure Act Motion to Dismiss August 21, 2018
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et alWestern District of Washington Administrative Procedure Act, Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief August 21, 2018
State of Washington et al v. United States of America et alWestern District of Washington Civil Rights Motion to Dismiss August 8, 2018
Jennifer Vera Gutierrez v. Pacific Gas and Electric CompanyNorthern District of California Other Statutory Actions Motion for Temporary Restraining Order July 26, 2018
The Klamath Tribes v. United States Bureau of Reclamation et alNorthern District of California Environmental/Land Use Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief July 23, 2018
Karnoski et al v. Trump et alWestern District of Washington Civil Rights, Employment Discrimination Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, Motion Hearing July 17, 2018
Lions Club v AlbanyNorthern District of California Civil Rights Motion for Summary Judgment May 24, 2018
California v BPNorthern District of California Environmental/Land Use Motion to Dismiss May 24, 2018
Hoopa Valley Tribe v. National Marine Fisheries, et al. and Yurok Tribe, et al. v. United States Bureau of ReclamationNorthern District of California Environmental/Land Use Motions for Relief from Judgment and/or Stay of Enforcement April 11, 2018
City and County of San Francisco v. Sessions and State of CA v. SessionsNorthern District of California Other Statutory Actions Motion to Dismiss March 5, 2018
John Doe, et al vs. Donald Trump, et alWestern District of Washington Civil Rights Preliminary/Permanent Injunction Hearing December 21, 2017
Edge et al v. City of EverettWestern District of Washington Civil Rights Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief November 22, 2017
Regents of University of California v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityNorthern District of California Administrative Procedure Act Case Management Conference November 7, 2017
Waymo LLC vs. Uber TechnologiesNorthern District of California Patent Technology Tutorial Hearing November 7, 2017
State of California v. Donald J. TrumpNorthern District of California Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief October 24, 2017
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project et al v. Sessions, III et alWestern District of Washington Civil Rights Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief July 25, 2017
Juweiya Abdiaziz Ali, et al vs. Donald J. Trump, et alWestern District of Washington Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief March 15, 2017
Acres v. Blue Lake Rancheria, et alNorthern District of California Jurisdiction Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, Motion to Dismiss February 22, 2017
State of Washington vs. Donald J. Trump, et alWestern District of Washington Civil Rights February 3, 2017
Crawford v. Antonio B. Won Pat International Airport Authority, Guam et alDistrict of Guam Civil Rights Motion to Certify Class September 21, 2016F.L.B. et al v. Lynch et alWestern District of Washington Civil Rights Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief July 8, 2016J
EFM et al v. Holder et alWestern District of Washington March 24, 2016
Twitter, Inc. v. Lynch, et alNorthern District of California Civil Rights, First Amendment, National Security Motion to Dismiss March 14, 2016
Aguero and Pangelinan v. Calvo and GarridoDistrict of Guam Civil Rights Motion for Summary Judgment June 5, 2015
Stalwart Capital, LLC v. iCap Pacific Northwest Opportunity and Income Fund, LLC et alWestern District of Washington Diversity Motion for Summary Judgment April 30, 2015
Aziz v. Knight Transportation, Inc.Western District of Washington Contract Motion for Summary Judgment March 18, 2015
Perez v. Acme Universal, Inc. et alDistrict of Guam Labor and Employment Motion to Dismiss March 31, 2014
American Freedom Defense Initiative et al v. King County Western District of Washington Civil Rights Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief January 27, 2014
K.M. et al v. Regence Blue Shield et al Western District of Washington ERISA Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, Motion to Certify Class January 22, 2014
Kyko Global, Inc. et al v. Prithvi Information Solutions, Ltd et al Western District of Washington Fraud Motion to Dismiss January 21, 2014
Keller v. City of Auburn, et al Western District of Washington August 28, 2013
Baxter v. MBA Group Insurance Trust, MBA Group Insurance Trust
Health and Welfare Plan, and Regence Blueshield.Western District of Washington ERISA Motion for Summary Judgment June 27, 2013
Hightower v. City and County of San FranciscoNorthern District of California Civil Rights Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief January 17, 2013
United States of America v Guam Waterworks District of Guam Environmental/Land Use Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations October 7, 2011
Zoom VIDEO TUTORIALS
Click the sections below to view video tutorials for Zoom.
You can also register for upcoming live training or access recent recordings. Zoom Meetings Webinars. Join a Meeting.
https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/206618765-Zoom-Video-Tutorials
The courts of the United States are closely linked hierarchical systems of courts at the federal and state levels. The federal courts form the judicial branch of the federal government of the United States and operate under the authority of the United States Constitution and federal law. The state and territorial courts of the individual U.S. states and territories operate under the authority of the state and territorial constitutions and state and territorial law.
Federal statutes that refer to the "courts of the United States" are referring only to the courts of the federal government, and not the courts of the individual states and counties. Because of the federalist underpinnings of the division between sovereign federal and state governments, the various state court systems are free to operate in ways that vary widely from those of the federal government, and from one another. In practice, however, every state has adopted a division of its judiciary into at least two levels, and almost every state has three levels, with trial courts hearing cases which may be reviewed by appellate courts, and finally by a state supreme court. A few states have two separate supreme courts, with one having authority over civil matters and the other reviewing criminal cases. 47 states and the federal government allow at least one appeal of right from a final judgment on the merits, meaning that the court receiving the appeal must decide the appeal after it is briefed and argued properly. Three states do not provide a right to a first appeal. Rather, they give litigants only a right to petition for the right to have an appeal heard.
State courts often have diverse names and structures, as illustrated below. State courts hear about 98% of litigation; most states have courts of special jurisdiction, which typically handle minor disputes such as traffic citations, and courts of general jurisdiction responsible for more serious disputes.[1]
The U.S. federal court system hears cases involving litigants from two or more states, violations of federal laws, treaties, and the Constitution, admiralty, bankruptcy, and related issues.[2]In practice, about 80% of the cases are civil and 20% criminal.[1] The civil cases often involve civil rights, patents, and Social Security while the criminal cases involve tax fraud, robbery, counterfeiting, and drug crimes.[1] The trial courts are U.S. district courts, followed by United States courts of appeals and then the Supreme Court of the United States. The judicial system, whether state or federal, begins with a court of first instance, whose work may be reviewed by an appellate court, and then ends at the court of last resort, which may review the work of the lower courts.[3]
Institutions which may be considered courts of the United States are listed below.
Main article: United States Federal CourtsThe geographical boundary of the 12 United States Courts of Appeals
Headquarters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims on Madison Place in Washington, D.C.See also: Article I and Article III tribunals
Courts of Alabama State courts of Alabama
Federal courts located in Alabama
(All United States District Courts in Alabama may be appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia)
Former federal courts of Alabama
Courts of Alaska State courts of Alaska
Federal courts located in Alaska
Courts of Arizona State courts of Arizona
Federal courts located in Arizona
Main article: Courts of ArkansasState courts of Arkansas
Federal courts located in Arkansas
Former federal courts of Arkansas
Courts of California Headquarters of the Supreme Court of California, in San Francisco.State courts of record of California
State quasi-administrative courts of California
State administrative courts of CaliforniaThis list is incomplete; you can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.
Federal courts located in California
Former federal courts of California
Courts of ColoradoState courts of Colorado
Federal courts located in Colorado
Courts of ConnecticutState courts of Connecticut
Federal court located in Connecticut:
Courts of DelawareState courts of Delaware
Federal courts located in Delaware
Courts of Florida Headquarters of the Florida Supreme Court in Tallahassee.State courts of Florida
Federal courts located in Florida
Former federal courts of Florida
Main article: Courts of Georgia (U.S. state)State courts of Georgia
Federal courts located in Georgia
Former federal courts of Georgia
Courts of Hawaii Aliʻiōlani Hale, in Honolulu, the building where the Hawaiʻi State Supreme CourtmeetsState courts of Hawaii
Federal courts located in Hawaii
Courts of IdahoState courts of Idaho
Federal courts located in Idaho
Courts of IllinoisThe Dirksen Federal Building in Chicago, headquarters of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
State courts of Illinois
Further information: State court (United States)
Federal courts located in Illinois
Further information: Federal judiciary of the United States
Former federal courts of Illinois
Courts of IndianaState courts of Indiana The E. Ross Adair Federal Building, seat of the Fort Wayne division of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Federal courts located in Indiana
Former federal courts of Indiana
IOWA
Main article: Courts of IowaState courts of Iowa
Federal courts located in Iowa
Former federal courts of Iowa
Main article: Courts of KansasState courts of Kansas
Federal courts located in Kansas
Main article: Courts of KentuckyKentucky Court of Justice
Under an amendment to the Kentucky Constitution passed by the state's voters in 1975,[130] judicial power in Kentucky is "vested exclusively in one Court of Justice", divided into the following:[131]
Federal courts located in this state
Former federal courts of Kentucky
Courts of LouisianaState courts of Louisiana Louisiana judicial districts map
Federal courts located in Louisiana The John Minor Wisdom U.S. Courthouse, home of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans
Former federal courts of Louisiana
Courts of MaineState courts of Maine
Federal courts located in Maine
Courts of Maryland Maryland judicial circuit mapState courts of Maryland
Federal courts located in Maryland
Former federal courts of Maryland
Courts of Massachusetts John Adams Courthouse in Boston, Massachusetts, home to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and Massachusetts Appeals CourtState courts of MassachusettsJudicial courts
Administrative courts
Federal courts located in Massachusetts
Courts of Michigan Judicial circuits map State courts of Michigan
Federal courts located in Michigan
Former federal courts of Michigan
Main article: Courts of Minnesota Supreme Court Chamber of the Minnesota Supreme Court in the Minnesota State Capitolin Saint Paul.State courts of Minnesota
Federal courts located in Minnesota
Federal courts located in Mississippi
Former federal courts of Mississippi
Courts of MissouriState courts of MissouriMissouri State Supreme Court building across from state capitol in Jefferson City.
Federal courts located in Missouri
Former federal courts of Missouri
Courts of MontanaState courts of Montana
Federal courts located in Montana
Courts of NebraskaState courts of Nebraska
Federal courts located in Nebraska
Judiciary of NevadaState courts of Nevada The headquarters of the Supreme Court of Nevada in Carson City.
Federal courts located in Nevada
Main article: Courts of New HampshireState courts of New Hampshire
Federal courts located in New Hampshire
Main article: Courts of New JerseyState courts of New JerseyFurther information: Judiciary of New Jersey Richard J. Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, New Jersey: The seat of the New Jersey Supreme Court and the central administrative offices of all statewide courts in New Jersey.
Federal courts located in New Jersey
Former federal courts of New Jersey
: Courts of New MexicoState courts of New Mexico
Federal courts located in New Mexico
Courts of New YorkState courts of New York The 1842 courthouse of the New York Court of Appeals in Albany
Federal courts located in New York
Former federal courts of New York
Main article: Courts of North CarolinaState courts of North Carolina
Federal courts located in North Carolina
Former federal courts of North Carolina
Main article: Courts of North DakotaState courts of North Dakota
Federal courts located in North Dakota
Courts of OhioState courts of Ohio The Thomas J. Moyer Ohio Judicial Center in Columbus, headquarters of the Supreme Court of Ohio
Federal courts located in this state
Former federal courts of Ohio
Main article: Courts of OklahomaState courts of Oklahoma
Federal courts located in Oklahoma
Main article: Courts of OregonState courts of OregonCourtroom of the Oregon Supreme Court.
Federal courts located in Oregon
Main article: Courts of PennsylvaniaState courts of Pennsylvania
Former colonial and state courts of Pennsylvania
Federal courts located in Pennsylvania
Former federal courts located in Pennsylvania
Main article: Courts of Rhode IslandState courts of Rhode Island
Federal courts located in Rhode Island
Main article: Courts of South CarolinaState courts of South Carolina
Federal courts located in South Carolina
Main article: Courts of South Dakota
State courts of South Dakota
Federal courts located in South Dakota
Main article: Courts of TennesseeState courts of Tennessee
Federal courts located in Tennessee
Former federal courts of Tennessee
Main article: Courts of TexasState courts of Texas
Federal courts located in Texas
Former federal courts of Texas
Main article: Courts of UtahThe Utah Supreme Court meets in the Scott M. Matheson Courthouse.State courts of Utah
Federal courts located in Utah
Main article: Courts of VermontState courts of Vermont
Federal courts located in Vermont
Main article: Courts of VirginiaState courts of Virginia
Federal courts located in Virginia
Former federal courts of Virginia
Main article: Courts of Washington (state)
State courts of Washington
The headquarters of the Washington Supreme Court in Olympia.
Federal courts located in Washington
Former federal courts of Washington
Main article: Courts of West VirginiaState courts of West Virginia
Federal courts located in West Virginia
Former federal courts of West Virginia
Main article: Courts of WisconsinState courts of Wisconsin
Federal courts located in Wisconsin
Former federal courts of Wisconsin
Main article: Courts of WyomingState courts of Wyoming
Federal courts located in Wyoming
Federal courts located in the District of Columbia
Former federal courts in the District of Columbia
See also: United States territorial court
High Court of American Samoacourthouse
Federal courts located in Puerto Rico:
Due to its involvement in the resolution of crimes and conflicts, which are an intricate part of drama, the U.S. judicial system is often portrayed in American literature and films.
Several Hollywood films such as A Few Good Men (1992) and Runaway Jury (2003) are set around its courts.
We love our customers, so feel free to visit during normal business hours.
1888-VID-COURTS
Open today | 09:00 am – 05:00 pm |
Copyright © 2024 VideoCourts™ - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
Parties participating in or observing court hearings via Zoom are NOT allowed to record, rebroadcast, or other wise reproduce
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.